| Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Date
July 27, 2005 Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
4 of 5
|
|  | Reviewed by: scrapper, Shoots in the 80s Summary:
good but not great course . There is a big difference between the fron t and back nine's . The front is shorter " target " golf with the back nine newer and tougher . Very tricky greens that were in great condition when I played . Very good couse for the price . Customer Service:
excellent
|
|
 |
Review Date
July 18, 2005 Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
4 of 5
|
| | Reviewed by: Dan Diorio, Shoots in the 80s Summary:
This is a great course for the price. There are some tough, challenging holes that may not seem difficult on the card. The par-5 9th is one of the most challenging holes in the area. The greens are always extremely fast, so be careful. Most balls that go into the woods are not find-able...keep it straight off the tee. Customer Service:
Excellent
|
|
|
Review Date
July 5, 2001 Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
Visitors rate this review
3.33 of 5, 3 votes |
| | Reviewed by: james mcnamara, Shoot in the 80s, from upton ma u.s.a. Summary:
this course is one of the toughest and best values around.If there is any thicker rough this side of an open championship I would like to see it.You can miss a fairway by three feet and have no chance at the green from 150,a great challenge when playing the ball down.Greens are normally very fast and most are undulating.If the pins are on a slope a two put is a very good accomplishment.The maintenence is very good.I have seen better tee conditions but really it is no big deal because you are concentrating on where to put your tee ball.The layout is superb witth many memorable holes.The course lets you know it is for real from the first tee with water left,swamp long right,and pines left daring the long hitters to try and hit it over the green monster.The course normally gets the best of me but to shoot a low score here is really satisfying.
Similar Courses Played:
None
|
|
|
