| Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Date
January 11, 2010 Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
 3 of 5
|
|  | Reviewed by: Buddyjay, Shoots in the 80s Summary:
Review for 2009: I think Springfield was in excellent condition this year. Of course the abundance of rain helped, but everytime I played, there were maintenance guys working on the course...even on 12/28.
Many have complained about the staff, but I haven't had any problems.
Customer Service:
I haven't had any problems. Similar Courses Played:
Paxon Hollow (Broomall)
|
|
 |
Review Date
May 26, 2006 Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
4 of 5
|
| | Reviewed by: BRIAN63, Shoots in the 80s Summary:
This course offers lots of elevations, blinded dog leg fairways, and postage stamp greens that make it a challenge. Back tees play just over 6K. Difficult to loose a ball here too (which is nice). Some tee boxes seem close too close. Overall, very well maintained. ALL the staff was friendly and extremely attentive. Customer Service:
Excellent customer service. Very friendly and well managed.
|
|
|
Review Date
July 10, 2001 Overall Rating
3 of 5
Value Rating
 2 of 5
|
| | Reviewed by: Sidney, Shoot in the 90s, from Glenolden, PA Summary:
Springfield has made significant improvements over the past couple of years. It can be a challenging, but offers scoring opportunities for the average golfer. The course is well maintained and greens/tees are always in good shape. Customer Service:
I thought the staff was arrogant and cold. The person I spoke to on the phone was abrupt, and the attendant in the pro shop acted as if he was doing me a favor. Maybe both were having bad days. . . Similar Courses Played:
The facilities are adequate. There is no driving range, but the putting green is large and undulating. The pro shop appears to be able to meet most golfers needs.
|
|
|
