Review Date
September 14, 2007

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Reviewed by: jking55607, Shoots in the 70s

Summary:
This is just a so so course. Not very well taken care in my opinion. There are some pretty long forced carries which isn't bad , but it limits a lot of people from scoring well. Overall it is just a so so course

Customer Service:
I actually thought the service seemed a bit pretentious. This surprised me considering the course was nothing to write home about

Review Date
May 18, 2005

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Reviewed by: topda, Shoots in the 80s

Summary:
A good test of golf. The course does not have any dog leg left holes, and has several dog leg right ones. A straight tee shot is the best bet. If you can keep it in the fairway you should avoid most of the trouble. The par 3's are perhaps more difficult than most other courses. The course has a lot of elevation changes that will effect club selection (best to go 2 clubs up on most uphill shots). The fairways, when cut, provide a lot of roll. The greens are usually medium speed (around an 7-8 stimp). Most 15 plus handicappers will usually lose at least 6 balls.

Customer Service:
Excellent staff

Similar Courses Played:
They have a grass driving range and new balls. However, the sand trap and green are only for members.