| Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Date
October 20, 2002 Overall Rating
 3 of 5
Value Rating
 2 of 5
Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5, 1 votes |
|  | Reviewed by: Nate Mullins, Shoots in the 100s, from Salt Lake City, UT, USA Summary:
Not a bad course, but a bit pricey. The layout is a lot of fun and challenging, but the greens seemed very inconsistent, they had sand on them and putting was a pain. There's a fair number of well-placed sand and water hazards, and if you mis-hit a ball into the trees and bushes you can pretty well forget about finding it. The rough is also punishing. However, hit it straight and you'll be rewarded. Overall a fun golfing experience. Customer Service:
Good
|
|
 |
Review Date
August 30, 2001 Overall Rating
2 of 5
Value Rating
 1 of 5
|
| | Reviewed by: Justin , Shoots in the 70s Summary:
Overpriced, overpriced, overpriced! A nice Rees Jones layout, and it shows. Very few gimmicks. Condition of course is indifferent. All-bermuda greens and fairways are dead & dry in places, but they are on water restrictions at the moment, so that is forgivable. The bunkers are disgraceful. They are hard grey dirt strewn liberally with rocks - some as big as your fist! Moveable impediment, my ass. The par 3's are too short in my opinion. From the tips, this course is a decent challenge, though the wild driver can survive on many holes, as most fairways are generous and also run into one another. From the whites, it's pretty short - a lot of 350 yard par 4's. This course would be a walker's nightmare - there are some long commutes from one green to the next tee. Similar Courses Played:
None
|
|
|
