Reviewed by: Jon, Shoots in the 80s

Summary:
I love this course...the pro is dead sexy. I wish I could spend more time there.

Similar Courses Played:
The draught beer is superb.

Reviewed by: stl900, Shoots in the 80s

Summary:
Poor course needs to simplify. Greens are slow, too easy even for a bad golfer such as myself. Back 9 much better than front. Price is right.

Reviewed by: purduecrew21, Shoots in the 70s, from Ballwin, MO

Summary:
A course that in the last couple years has gone downhill. Very nice greens, fun for the inexperienced player because they are slow enough that if you miss you aren't going to run it ten feet past and 3 or four putt. The fairways are decent. Overall a good course layout that just has not been groomed the way it should have been.

Reviewed by: Brad, Shoot in the 70s, from St. Louis, MO, USA

Summary:
This course is somewhat of an oddity. It is very difficult to determine where to aim of the tee for the most part on the first 8 holes. There are little or no yardage markers. The fairways are a little rough but what do you expect in this price range. The greens are actually pretty and are a little slow but they rool pretty good and you can make putts. THe last 10 holes are definately better. It appears to have been constructed later than the front nine but was designed and completed much better. The condition of these holes are also pretty good. All-in-all the course is worth about $30/ weekend with cart in St. Louis area. It is pretty good for those that are "working" on their games. More seasoned players should go across the street and pay $60 for Tapawingo.

Similar Courses Played:
just the basics, hot dogs, chips, d beer, etc.